Social Media Image Size Reference

Current image dimensions for eight platforms — posts, stories, covers and thumbnails — with the safe zones that stop text being cropped off.

Instagram

1080×1080
Square post
1080 × 1080 · 1.00:1
1080×1350
Portrait post
1080 × 1350 · 0.80:1
The feed-filling default since 2015
1080×566
Landscape post
1080 × 566 · 1.91:1
1080×1920
Story / Reel
1080 × 1920 · 0.56:1
Keep text inside the middle ~1080x1420 — UI covers top and bottom
320×320
Profile photo
320 × 320 · 1.00:1

Facebook

1200×630
Shared image
1200 × 630 · 1.90:1
820×312
Cover photo
820 × 312 · 2.63:1
Mobile crops the sides — centre the subject
1920×1005
Event cover
1920 × 1005 · 1.91:1
1080×1920
Story
1080 × 1920 · 0.56:1
170×170
Profile photo
170 × 170 · 1.00:1

X (Twitter)

1600×900
Post image
1600 × 900 · 1.78:1
1500×500
Header
1500 × 500 · 3.00:1
Profile photo overlaps the bottom-left
1200×628
Link card
1200 × 628 · 1.91:1
400×400
Profile photo
400 × 400 · 1.00:1

LinkedIn

1200×627
Post image
1200 × 627 · 1.91:1
1584×396
Personal cover
1584 × 396 · 4.00:1
Face photo overlaps the lower-left on profiles
1128×191
Company cover
1128 × 191 · 5.91:1
400×400
Profile photo
400 × 400 · 1.00:1
300×300
Company logo
300 × 300 · 1.00:1

YouTube

1280×720
Thumbnail
1280 × 720 · 1.78:1
Under 2 MB; readable at 120px wide is the real test
2560×1440
Channel art
2560 × 1440 · 1.78:1
Only the central 1546x423 safe area shows on every device
1080×1920
Shorts
1080 × 1920 · 0.56:1
800×800
Profile photo
800 × 800 · 1.00:1

TikTok

1080×1920
Video / cover
1080 × 1920 · 0.56:1
Right-side icon rail covers ~120px; keep text left of it
200×200
Profile photo
200 × 200 · 1.00:1

Pinterest

1000×1500
Standard pin
1000 × 1500 · 0.67:1
2:3 is the algorithm-preferred ratio; taller gets cut
165×165
Profile photo
165 × 165 · 1.00:1
222×150
Board cover
222 × 150 · 1.48:1

Twitch

1200×480
Banner
1200 × 480 · 2.50:1
1920×1080
Offline screen
1920 × 1080 · 1.78:1
800×800
Profile photo
800 × 800 · 1.00:1

There is no one image for everything

A centre crop only ever cares about shape, never about size: whichever side is proportionally too long gets trimmed, so the surviving share is the smaller aspect over the larger one. That also makes the loss symmetric — fitting 16:9 into 9:16 costs exactly what the reverse costs.

The 31 placements below run from LinkedIn's Company cover at 5.91:1 down to a 0.563:1 story — a 10.5-fold spread of shapes. Ask which single aspect ratio survives all of them best and the answer has a closed form: the one that minimises the worst crop is the geometric mean of the two extremes, because minimising the largest distance to the ends of an interval puts you at its midpoint, and on a ratio scale the midpoint is the geometric mean. That is 1.82:1 — and even it throws away 69.1% of the picture at the extremes. Nothing does better. The nice part is where that lands: 16:9 is within 0.8 of a point of the theoretical optimum, so an ordinary screenshot is very nearly the best compromise shape available.

Ask for the smallest average crop instead and you get a different answer, which is worth knowing before trusting any single recommendation. It is a perfect square — 32.9% average against the 1.82:1 shape's 36.1% — but a square is dreadful at its worst, losing 83.1% to a full-height story. The reason a square wins on average is not subtle once you count: 10 of the 31 placements already are one, because every profile photo on every platform is 1:1. That same duplication is why 31 rows hold only 16 genuinely different shapes.

For reference: a 4:3 phone photo loses 77.4% at its worst placement and 36.4% on average; a 16:9 frame loses 69.9% and 35.7%. An image of 2560 × 1920 is the smallest that fills every placement here without being enlarged. Aspect ratios are far more stable than pixel counts — platforms tweak the latter and rarely touch the former. Pair this with the Image Cropper or Compressor.

How to use

  1. Find your platform and image type.
  2. Note the dimensions and aspect ratio.
  3. Keep important content inside the safe zone.
  4. Check the platform's own guidance, which changes.

Frequently asked questions

Why does my image get cropped differently in the feed?

Because platforms show a preview at a fixed aspect ratio and crop to fit, often from the centre. An image that looks right when opened can lose its top and bottom in the feed, which is why the safe zone matters more than the full dimensions.

What is a safe zone?

The central region guaranteed to survive cropping across the places an image appears. Keeping text, faces and logos inside it means the image works in the feed, in a preview card and on a profile, rather than only in the version you designed.

Should I upload larger than the stated size?

Generally yes, at the same aspect ratio. Platforms downscale, and downscaling produces better results than upscaling. There are upload limits, and very large files may be compressed harder — so twice the stated dimensions is usually a sensible ceiling.

Why does my image look worse after uploading?

Because platforms recompress everything to manage bandwidth. You cannot prevent it, but you can reduce the damage: upload at the right dimensions so no resizing is needed, avoid fine detail and thin text, and prefer formats the platform handles well. Sharp text and gradients suffer most.

How often do these sizes change?

Often enough that any published table dates. Platforms revise layouts regularly and rarely announce dimension changes prominently. Where an image matters, the platform's own current guidance is the authority — this page is a convenient starting point rather than a permanent reference.

Does one image work everywhere?

Not well. Aspect ratios differ substantially between a square feed post, a vertical story and a wide cover, and forcing one image into all of them means bad crops somewhere. Designing the important content into a central square gives the best chance across formats.

🔒 This tool runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is uploaded, logged, or stored.