Solunar & Bite Forecast

Solunar fishing periods computed from real lunar astronomy for your location — majors, minors and moon phase, with an honest note on the evidence.

The astronomy here is real and computed for your exact location — moon transits, rises and sets from the same lunar model as our star tools (verified in tests). The solunar theory — that fish feed hardest during these windows — is angling tradition dating to John Alden Knight's 1926 tables: beloved, plausible around dawn/dusk overlaps, and never scientifically settled. Plan with it, but let the fish vote.

Two good stretches a month, not one

The tradition rates days near both new moon and full moon as best, so the rating runs on half the lunar month — a cycle of 14.77 days rather than 29.53. Across 2026:

RatingDaysSharePredicted from the thresholds
5 fish 75 20.5% 74.2
4 fish 75 20.5% 74.2
3 fish 98 26.8% 98.9
2 fish 117 32.1% 117.8

The right-hand column is not a second count. Syzygies come every 14.77 days, so the distance to the nearest one never exceeds half of that — 7.38 days, a quarter of the lunar month — and it is spread evenly across that span. The thresholds at 1.5, 3 and 5 days carve it into bands, and the widths alone predict the counts to within a day on every row.

Note also where the scale stops. Sweeping every possible phase, the rating only ever returns 2, 3, 4, 5. There is no such thing as a one-fish day — the worst the calendar can say about a date is two out of five, which is worth knowing before reading a 2 as a warning rather than as the floor.

The phase label and the star rating use different windows

The two lines on the readout come from different functions with different thresholds. The name calls it a new moon within ±0.97 days of the exact phase; the rating awards five fish within ±1.5 days. The rating window is 1.54× wider.

Days in 2026
Rated 5 fish75
…and labelled New or Full moon47
…labelled something else28
Labelled New or Full but rated below 50

So 37% of top-rated days show up under a crescent or gibbous heading, and the reverse never happens — which follows from the windows rather than from the sample, since every phase inside the narrower one is inside the wider one by construction.

Neither function is wrong. A phase name describes what the moon looks like and a rating makes a claim about fishing; they were never obliged to share a boundary. But the readout puts them on adjacent lines, where "waning crescent — 5/5 day" reads like a contradiction rather than two answers to two questions.

The windows walk around the clock

The major periods track the moon's transits, and the moon crosses the meridian later each day. Measured off this page's own astronomy:

WindowSamplesMean driftRange
180 days161 50.5 min/day 40–66
18 days15 48.4 min/day 40–60

Over 180 days the drift lands on the familiar 50 minutes. The word "about" is doing real work, though: day to day it runs from 40 to 66 minutes, because the moon's orbit is elliptical and it does not move at a constant rate — a spread of 26 minutes around a mean of 51. Which means a short sample does not converge on the answer, it lands somewhere in the neighbourhood: eighteen days gives 48.4, only 2.1 off but four times further from the truth than the long window, with nothing in it to say which way it is wrong.

The practical consequence is that a good window is a moving target. 25% of days put the moon's upper transit within 90 minutes of sunrise or sunset — the overlap the tradition rates highest — and which days those are shifts by most of an hour every day.

How to use

  1. Set your location so the times are correct.
  2. Read the major and minor periods for the day.
  3. Compare against sunrise and sunset.
  4. Keep your own log and see whether it holds up for your water.

Frequently asked questions

What is solunar theory?

The idea, published by John Alden Knight in 1926, that fish and game feed most actively at times related to the moon's position — majors when the moon is overhead or underfoot, minors at moonrise and moonset. The times here are computed from real lunar astronomy rather than a lookup table.

Does it actually work?

The honest answer is that the evidence is weak and contested. Some studies find lunar correlations with feeding activity in some species; others find nothing once other factors are controlled. It is popular among anglers and has never been established the way tide or temperature effects have.

What matters more than solunar timing?

Water temperature, weather fronts, light levels, wind and season, by most accounts. Dawn and dusk are reliably productive across a great many species, and a falling barometer before a front is a more widely trusted signal than anything lunar.

Why do so many anglers believe in it?

Partly because major periods often overlap dawn and dusk, which genuinely are productive — so the theory gets credit for an effect with another cause. Partly because remembering the good days and forgetting the ordinary ones is what human memory does with any prediction.

Is tide the same thing?

No, though both come from the moon. Tide is a physical movement of water that demonstrably affects feeding in coastal and estuarine species, and its influence is not in dispute. Solunar theory claims an effect on freshwater fish where no water movement is involved, which is a much stronger claim.

What is the sensible way to use this?

As one input, and as a prompt to keep records. If you log catches against the predicted periods over a season on your own water, you will learn more about whether it holds there than any general claim can tell you — and that log is worth more than the forecast.

🔒 This tool runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is uploaded, logged, or stored.